Apollo 2Apptronik source ↗Robot Comparison · Interactive
Apollo 2 vs Figure 03
A symmetrical comparison using normalized manufacturer-reported specifications. Green highlights mark the stronger value only where the specification has a defensible direction.
Apollo 2Apptronik source ↗
Figure 03Figure source ↗Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Specifications
| Field | Apollo 2 | Figure 03 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apptronik | Figure |
| Version | 2 | 03 |
| Form factor | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | Select customers | Select customers |
| Primary use | Industrial manipulation and logistics | General-purpose home and commercial work |
| Starting price | Unknown | Unknown |
| Price qualifier | Contact sales | Not publicly listed |
| Height (m) | Unknown | 1.7272 |
| Weight (kg) | Unknown | 61 |
| Payload (kg) | Unknown | 20 |
| Runtime (hours) | Unknown | 5 |
| Maximum speed (m/s) | Unknown | 1.2 |
| Degrees of freedom | Unknown | Unknown |
| Reach (m) | Unknown | Unknown |
| Battery | Swappable batteries with opportunity-charging and tethering options | 2.3 kWh pack with 2 kW wireless inductive charging |
| Sensors | perception system, speech and listening hardware | head cameras, palm cameras, fingertip tactile sensors, audio system |
| Onboard compute | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Software | Artemis, Fleet Connect, Gemini Robotics integration | Helix, 10 Gbps mmWave data offload |
| Safety | hardware safety zones, impact-zone stop, configurable perimeter zone | multi-density foam, soft textiles, UN38.3-certified battery |
| Control modes | autonomous | autonomous |
| Target applications | goods-to-person, person-to-goods, packout, kitting, machine tending | home tasks, manufacturing logistics, general-purpose manipulation |
13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Interactive comparison only; editorial indexing gate not met
Apollo 2 Positioning
Figure 03 Positioning
Primary Evidence
Manufacturer Sources and Freshness
Browse every robotics model, robot platform, and curated comparison →
Questions
Apollo 2 vs Figure 03 FAQs
Which is better, Apollo 2 or Figure 03?+
There is no defensible overall robot winner without a target task and environment. Compare form factor, availability, payload, runtime, speed, sensing, control, safety, and price; green highlights apply only to specifications with an explicit direction.
Which can carry more, Apollo 2 or Figure 03?+
A direct answer is unavailable because Apollo 2 does not publish a normalized payload (kg) in the current source.
Which runs longer, Apollo 2 or Figure 03?+
A direct answer is unavailable because Apollo 2 does not publish a normalized runtime (hours) in the current source.
Which is faster, Apollo 2 or Figure 03?+
A direct answer is unavailable because Apollo 2 does not publish a normalized maximum speed (m/s) in the current source.
Which costs less, Apollo 2 or Figure 03?+
A normalized price comparison is unavailable. Apollo 2: Contact sales. Figure 03: Not publicly listed.
Can I buy Apollo 2 or Figure 03 today?+
Apollo 2 is recorded as select customers (Apptronik invites deployment inquiries; no public price or delivery schedule is cited.); Figure 03 is select customers (Figure describes production and company deployments; no public purchase price is cited.). Availability can be regional or customer-specific.
What are Apollo 2 and Figure 03 designed to do?+
Apollo 2: Industrial manipulation and logistics. Figure 03: General-purpose home and commercial work.
What sensors do Apollo 2 and Figure 03 use?+
Apollo 2: perception system, speech and listening hardware. Figure 03: head cameras, palm cameras, fingertip tactile sensors, audio system.
What software and control options do Apollo 2 and Figure 03 support?+
Apollo 2: Artemis, Fleet Connect, Gemini Robotics integration. Figure 03: Helix, 10 Gbps mmWave data offload. Apollo 2: autonomous. Figure 03: autonomous.
Are Apollo 2 and Figure 03 the same type of robot?+
Yes. Both are categorized as humanoid platforms, though their intended use and specifications may differ.