Seed 2.0 Code vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
ByteDance Seed · activeSeed 2.0 CodeVerified Sep 3, 2026
ByteDance Seed · activeSeed 2.1 TurboVerified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.1 Turbo
DeveloperByteDance SeedByteDance Seed
FamilySeed 2 0Seed 2 1
ModelSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.1 Turbo
VersionSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.1 Turbo
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-02-142026-06-23
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknownUnknown
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

12 comparable fields · 5 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Seed 2.0 Code Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.50
Output price$3.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.0-code

Seed 2.1 Turbo Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDbytedance-seed/seed-2.1-turbo

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Seed 2.0 Code vs Seed 2.1 Turbo FAQs

Is Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Seed 2.0 Code and Seed 2.1 Turbo, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo?+

Only Seed 2.0 Code has a directly sourced input price: $0.50 per million tokens. Only Seed 2.0 Code has a directly sourced output price: $3.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Seed 2.0 Code is — and Seed 2.1 Turbo is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Seed 2.0 Code is not marked open weight; Seed 2.1 Turbo is not marked open weight.

Can Seed 2.0 Code and Seed 2.1 Turbo understand images?+

Seed 2.0 Code is not documented with image input; Seed 2.1 Turbo is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Seed 2.0 Code is — and Seed 2.1 Turbo is —.

Do Seed 2.0 Code and Seed 2.1 Turbo support reasoning and tool use?+

Seed 2.0 Code: reasoning and tool calling. Seed 2.1 Turbo: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo?+

Seed 2.0 Code has 1 sourced provider route; Seed 2.1 Turbo has 0, so Seed 2.0 Code has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.1 Turbo?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback