Qwen3 Coder Next Base vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B
At a Glance
| Compare | Qwen3.5 35B A3BQwen | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #37 of 5717.2 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 5.7–72.4 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.14Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.00Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3-Coder-Next-Base | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Qwen |
| Family | Qwen3 Coder Next Base | Qwen3 5 35b A3b |
| Model | Qwen3-Coder-Next-Base | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
| Version | Qwen3-Coder-Next-Base | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 79.7B | 36B |
| Active parameters | 3B | 3B |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Qwen3 Coder Next Base Capabilities
Qwen3.5 35B A3B Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3 Coder Next Base vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B FAQs
Is Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3 Coder Next Base and Qwen3.5 35B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Only Qwen3.5 35B A3B has a directly sourced input price: $0.14 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.5 35B A3B has a directly sourced output price: $1.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 262,144 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3 Coder Next Base is open weight; Qwen3.5 35B A3B is open weight.
Can Qwen3 Coder Next Base and Qwen3.5 35B A3B understand images?+
Qwen3 Coder Next Base is not documented with image input; Qwen3.5 35B A3B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Qwen3 Coder Next Base and Qwen3.5 35B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3 Coder Next Base: tool calling. Qwen3.5 35B A3B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
Qwen3 Coder Next Base has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.5 35B A3B has 4, so Qwen3.5 35B A3B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3 Coder Next Base or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.