Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.7-Plus
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,437.8499% of row best · rating · qwen3.5-397b-a17b; 95% CI [1434.48605524, 1441.19621255]; votes 73400; rank 68 | 1,453.70100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1449.21174793, 1458.19774266]; votes 37854; rank 36 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,264.8099% of row best · rating · qwen3.5-397b-a17b; 95% CI [1258.85111028, 1270.75814841]; votes 25997; rank 38 | 1,281.06100% of row best · rating · qwen3.7-plus; 95% CI [1273.03498970, 1289.09217677]; votes 9132; rank 26 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Qwen |
| Family | Qwen3 5 397b A17b | Qwen3 7 Plus |
| Model | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Version | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-02-15 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262,144 | 1,000,000 |
| Total parameters | 403,397,928,944 | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 17,000,000,000 | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B Capabilities
Qwen3.7-Plus Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Qwen3.7-PlusQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-FlashQwen | family variantsimage, text, video |
Qwen3.7-PlusQwen | vs | Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | family variantsimage, text, video |
Qwen3.7-PlusQwen | vs |  GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs | family variantsimage, text | |
| vs | Qwen3.8-27BQwen | family variantsimage, text | |
 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | Qwen3.7-PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs |  Kimi-K2.5Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Kimi-K2.6Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs |  Mistral-Medium-3.5-128BMistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Qwen3.7-PlusQwen | vs | GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
 Gemini Computer UseGoogle DeepMind | vs | Qwen3.7-PlusQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.7-Plus FAQs
Is Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.7-Plus, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus?+
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is $0.39 and Qwen3.7-Plus is $2.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is $2.34 and Qwen3.7-Plus is $8.00 per million tokens, so Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus?+
Qwen3.7-Plus has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262,144 and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1,000,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus be self-hosted?+
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is open weight; Qwen3.7-Plus is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.7-Plus understand images?+
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is documented with image input; Qwen3.7-Plus is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is — and Qwen3.7-Plus is 131,072.
Do Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.7-Plus support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7-Plus: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus?+
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7-Plus has 1, so Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.7-Plus?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.