phi-4 vs Codestral 22B v0.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  phi-4Microsoft |  Codestral 22B v0.1Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | #43 of 570.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.0–66.7 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.070Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.14Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 16K | 33K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | phi-4 | Codestral-22B-v0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Microsoft | Mistral AI |
| Family | Phi 4 | Codestral 22b V0 1 |
| Model | phi-4 | Codestral-22B-v0.1 |
| Version | phi-4 | Codestral-22B-v0.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2024-12-12 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 16K | 33K |
| Total parameters | 14.7B | 22.2B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | mit | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation | generation |
phi-4 Capabilities
Codestral 22B v0.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs | phi-4Microsoft | family variantstext |
 Molmo2-8BAi2 | vs | phi-4Microsoft | cross-developer peerstext |
MolmoWeb 4BAi2 | vs | phi-4Microsoft | cross-developer peerstext |
MolmoWeb 8BAi2 | vs | phi-4Microsoft | cross-developer peerstext |
| vs | phi-4Microsoft | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Command A TranslateCohere | vs | phi-4Microsoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Phi-4-mini-instructMicrosoft | vs | phi-4Microsoft | family variantstext |
Phi-4-mini-reasoningMicrosoft | vs | phi-4Microsoft | family variantstext |
Phi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoft | vs | phi-4Microsoft | family variantstext |
phi-4Microsoft | vs | Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
phi-4Microsoft | vs |  PII-TracerPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
phi-4 vs Codestral 22B v0.1 FAQs
Is phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both phi-4 and Codestral 22B v0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
Only phi-4 has a directly sourced input price: $0.070 per million tokens. Only phi-4 has a directly sourced output price: $0.14 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
Codestral 22B v0.1 has the larger sourced context window. phi-4 supports 16,384 tokens and Codestral 22B v0.1 supports 32,768 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. phi-4 is open weight; Codestral 22B v0.1 is open weight.
Can phi-4 and Codestral 22B v0.1 understand images?+
phi-4 is not documented with image input; Codestral 22B v0.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do phi-4 and Codestral 22B v0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
phi-4: none of these features are definitively sourced. Codestral 22B v0.1: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
phi-4 has 3 sourced provider routes; Codestral 22B v0.1 has 0, so phi-4 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, phi-4 or Codestral 22B v0.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.