PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 vs Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Baidu · activePaddleOCR-VL-1.5Verified Aug 28, 2026
Mistral AI · activeMinistral-3-3B-Base-2512Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldPaddleOCR-VL-1.5Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512
DeveloperBaiduMistral AI
FamilyPaddleocr VL 1 5Ministral 3 3b Base 2512
ModelPaddleOCR-VL-1.5Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512
VersionPaddleOCR-VL-1.5Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-01-29Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131,072262,144
Total parameters958,588,7364,251,743,232
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownUnknown
Capabilitieschat, generationgeneration

13 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 Capabilities

chatgeneration
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDPaddlePaddle/PaddleOCR-VL-1.5

Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 Capabilities

generation
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 vs Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 FAQs

Is PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 and Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512?+

Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 has the larger sourced context window. PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 supports 131,072 and Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 supports 262,144.

Which performs better in benchmarks, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 is open weight; Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 is open weight.

Can PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 and Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 understand images?+

PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 is documented with image input; Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 is — and Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 is —.

Do PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 and Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 support reasoning and tool use?+

PaddleOCR-VL-1.5: image input. Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512?+

PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 has 0 sourced provider routes; Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512 has 0, a tie.

Which offers better value, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 or Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback