Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 vs GLM OCR
At a Glance
| Compare |  Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512Mistral AI |  GLM OCRZ.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.10Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.10Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512 | GLM-OCR |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Mistral AI | Z.ai |
| Family | Ministral 3 3b Instruct 2512 | Glm OCR |
| Model | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512 | GLM-OCR |
| Version | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512 | GLM-OCR |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 3.8B | 1.3B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, tools |
Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 Capabilities
GLM OCR Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512Mistral AI | vs | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | family variantsimage, text |
Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | vs | Ministral-3-3B-Reasoning-2512Mistral AI | family variantsimage, text |
Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | vs | Ministral-3-8B-Base-2512Mistral AI | family variantsimage, text |
Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | vs | Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | family variantsimage, text |
 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen | vs | Ministral-3-3B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 vs GLM OCR FAQs
Is Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 and GLM OCR, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR?+
Only Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 has a directly sourced input price: $0.10 per million tokens. Only Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 has a directly sourced output price: $0.10 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR?+
Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 has the larger sourced context window. Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 supports 262,144 tokens and GLM OCR supports 131,072 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 is open weight; GLM OCR is open weight.
Can Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 and GLM OCR understand images?+
Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 is documented with image input; GLM OCR is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 and GLM OCR support reasoning and tool use?+
Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512: tool calling and image input. GLM OCR: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR?+
Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 has 1 sourced provider route; GLM OCR has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Ministral 3 3B Instruct 2512 or GLM OCR?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.