Lyria 3.5 vs VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Lyria 3.5 | VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Microsoft |
| Family | Lyria | Vibevoice ASR Streaming |
| Model | Lyria 3.5 | VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming-7B |
| Version | Lyria 3.5 | VibeVoice-ASR-Streaming-7B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-07-29 | 2026-09-03 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Audio |
| Output modalities | Text, Audio | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 8.7B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | mit |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | generation, image-to-music, lyrics, music-generation, synthid, vocals | diarization, hotwords, multilingual, streaming, transcription |
| Streaming chunk | Unknown | 22 frames |
| Streaming lookahead | Unknown | 4 frames |
| Supported languages | Unknown | Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish |
| Target sample rate | Unknown | 24000 Hz |
12 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Lyria 3.5 Capabilities
VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Lyria 3.5Google DeepMind | developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Lyria 3.5 vs VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B FAQs
Is Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Lyria 3.5 and VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Lyria 3.5 is 1,049K and VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B be self-hosted?+
VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Lyria 3.5 is not marked open weight; VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B is open weight.
Can Lyria 3.5 and VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B understand images?+
Lyria 3.5 is documented with image input; VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Lyria 3.5 is 66K and VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B is —.
Do Lyria 3.5 and VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B support reasoning and tool use?+
Lyria 3.5: image input. VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B?+
Lyria 3.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B has 0, so Lyria 3.5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Lyria 3.5 or VibeVoice ASR Streaming 7B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.