GPT-5.4 Nano vs Grok Build 0.1

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoGrok Build 0.1
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader75.27100% of row best · percent · gpt-5.4-nano-xhigh · 46,179 output tokens / case71.0994% of row best · percent · grok-build-0.1 · 980 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Openai · activeGPT-5.4 NanoVerified Sep 3, 2026
Xai · previewGrok Build 0.1Verified Sep 3, 2026
Not a Valid ComparisonThese records do not share a sourced modality and workload.

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Interactive only
FieldGPT-5.4 NanoGrok Build 0.1
DeveloperOpenaiXai
FamilyGpt 5 4Grok Build
ModelGPT-5.4 NanoGrok Build 0.1
VersionGPT-5.4 NanoGrok Build 0.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-03-172026-05-29
Knowledge cutoff2025-08-31Unknown
Input modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Output modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Context window400,000256,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

12 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met

GPT-5.4 Nano Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.20
Output price$1.25
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.4-nano

Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-build-0.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs

Is GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5.4 Nano and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1?+

Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a directly sourced input price: $0.20 per million tokens. Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a directly sourced output price: $1.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1?+

GPT-5.4 Nano has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5.4 Nano supports 400,000 and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5.4 Nano is not marked open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-5.4 Nano and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+

GPT-5.4 Nano is not documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5.4 Nano is 128,000 and Grok Build 0.1 is —.

Do GPT-5.4 Nano and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-5.4 Nano: reasoning and tool calling. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1?+

GPT-5.4 Nano has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so GPT-5.4 Nano has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GPT-5.4 Nano or Grok Build 0.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback