GLM 5 vs GLM OCR
At a Glance
| Compare | GLM 5Z.ai | GLM OCRZ.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.60Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.92Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 203K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GLM-5 | GLM-OCR |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | Z.ai |
| Family | Glm 5 | Glm OCR |
| Model | GLM-5 | GLM-OCR |
| Version | GLM-5 | GLM-OCR |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 203K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 753.9B | 1.3B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | mit | mit |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, tools |
GLM 5 Capabilities
GLM OCR Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GLM 5 vs GLM OCR FAQs
Is GLM 5 or GLM OCR better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GLM 5 and GLM OCR, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5 or GLM OCR?+
Only GLM 5 has a directly sourced input price: $0.60 per million tokens. Only GLM 5 has a directly sourced output price: $1.92 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, GLM 5 or GLM OCR?+
GLM 5 has the larger sourced context window. GLM 5 supports 202,752 tokens and GLM OCR supports 131,072 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GLM 5 or GLM OCR?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can GLM 5 or GLM OCR be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. GLM 5 is open weight; GLM OCR is open weight.
Can GLM 5 and GLM OCR understand images?+
GLM 5 is not documented with image input; GLM OCR is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GLM 5 or GLM OCR?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do GLM 5 and GLM OCR support reasoning and tool use?+
GLM 5: reasoning and tool calling. GLM OCR: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GLM 5 or GLM OCR?+
GLM 5 has 4 sourced provider routes; GLM OCR has 1, so GLM 5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, GLM 5 or GLM OCR?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.