GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Z.ai · activeGLM-5.1Verified Aug 28, 2026
Z.ai · activeGLM-5V-TurboVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGLM-5.1GLM-5V-Turbo
DeveloperZ.aiZ.ai
FamilyGlm 5 1Glm 5v
ModelGLM-5.1GLM-5V-Turbo
VersionGLM-5.1GLM-5V-Turbo
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window202,752200,000
Total parameters753,864,139,008Unknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Z.ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, tools, vision

13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

GLM-5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$1.05
Output price$3.50
Serving providers2
Canonical IDzai-org/GLM-5.1

GLM-5V-Turbo Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningtoolsvision
Input price
Output price
Serving providers1
Canonical IDzai-org/glm-5v-turbo

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vsfamily variantstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo FAQs

Is GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GLM-5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?+

Only GLM-5.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.05 per million tokens. Only GLM-5.1 has a directly sourced output price: $3.50 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?+

GLM-5.1 has the larger sourced context window. GLM-5.1 supports 202,752 and GLM-5V-Turbo supports 200,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo be self-hosted?+

GLM-5.1 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. GLM-5.1 is open weight; GLM-5V-Turbo is not marked open weight.

Can GLM-5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo understand images?+

GLM-5.1 is not documented with image input; GLM-5V-Turbo is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GLM-5.1 is — and GLM-5V-Turbo is 131,072.

Do GLM-5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo support reasoning and tool use?+

GLM-5.1: reasoning and tool calling. GLM-5V-Turbo: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?+

GLM-5.1 has 2 sourced provider routes; GLM-5V-Turbo has 1, so GLM-5.1 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback