Gemma 4 E2B vs Gemma 4 E4B
Why this pair: Small effective-size Gemma 4 variants
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 E2B | Gemma 4 E4B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Gemma 4 |
| Model | Gemma 4 E2B | Gemma 4 E4B |
| Version | Gemma 4 E2B | Gemma 4 E4B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-02 | 2026-03-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Together Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
15 comparable fields · 3 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Gemma 4 E2B Capabilities
Gemma 4 E4B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Muse Spark 1.2Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.2Meta | cross-developer peersaudio, image, text, video |
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3 VL PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Qwen3.7-PlusQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.1 EvolvingByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 E2B vs Gemma 4 E4B FAQs
Is Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 E2B and Gemma 4 E4B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B?+
Only Gemma 4 E4B has a directly sourced input price: $0.020 per million tokens. Only Gemma 4 E4B has a directly sourced output price: $0.10 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemma 4 E2B is 131,072 and Gemma 4 E4B is 131,072.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 E2B is open weight; Gemma 4 E4B is open weight.
Can Gemma 4 E2B and Gemma 4 E4B understand images?+
Gemma 4 E2B is documented with image input; Gemma 4 E4B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 E2B is — and Gemma 4 E4B is —.
Do Gemma 4 E2B and Gemma 4 E4B support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 E2B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemma 4 E4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B?+
Gemma 4 E2B has 1 sourced provider route; Gemma 4 E4B has 2, so Gemma 4 E4B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 E2B or Gemma 4 E4B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.