Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.4 Mini
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMind |  GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | #26 of 5747.4 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 15.8–82.5 | #35 of 5720.8 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #21 of 27$0.214 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9 | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #27 of 2721.6 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.070Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | $0.75Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | $4.50Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 400K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,434.12100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-26b-a4b; 95% CI [1426.70039347, 1441.53160125]; votes 6094; rank 90 | 1,411.4598% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-mini-high; 95% CI [1407.73358875, 1415.16901218]; votes 63449; rank 137 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,259.70100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-26b-a4b; 95% CI [1253.23971386, 1266.15382555]; votes 23943; rank 55 | 1,245.0199% of row best · rating · gpt-5.4-mini-high; 95% CI [1238.81649273, 1251.21275945]; votes 25733; rank 68 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | OpenAI |
| Family | Gemma 4 | Gpt 5 4 |
| Model | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Version | Gemma 4 26B-A4B | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2026-03-17 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-08-31 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 400K |
| Total parameters | 26B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 4B | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Gemma 4 26B A4B Capabilities
GPT-5.4 Mini Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 31BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemma 4 E4BGoogle DeepMind | family variantsimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Ministral-3-3B-Reasoning-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Ministral-3-8B-Base-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Ministral-3-8B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | Ministral-3-8B-Reasoning-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemma 4 26B-A4BGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.4 Mini FAQs
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5.4 Mini, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.0675 and GPT-5.4 Mini is $0.75 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on this metric. Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.225 and GPT-5.4 Mini is $4.50 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini?+
GPT-5.4 Mini has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 26B A4B supports 262,144 tokens and GPT-5.4 Mini supports 400,000 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini be self-hosted?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B is documented as self-hostable; GPT-5.4 Mini is documented as not self-hostable. Gemma 4 26B A4B is open weight; GPT-5.4 Mini is not marked open weight.
Can Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5.4 Mini understand images?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B is documented with image input; GPT-5.4 Mini is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini?+
GPT-5.4 Mini has a sourced maximum output of 128,000 tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5.4 Mini support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.4 Mini: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini?+
Gemma 4 26B A4B has 4 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.4 Mini has 2, so Gemma 4 26B A4B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.4 Mini?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.