Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.1

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Google Deepmind · activeGemini 3.8 FlashVerified Sep 2, 2026
Openai · activeGPT-5.1Verified Sep 3, 2026
Not a Valid ComparisonThese records do not share a sourced modality and workload.

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Interactive only
FieldGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.1
DeveloperGoogle DeepmindOpenai
FamilyGemini 3Gpt 5 1
ModelGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.1
VersionGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-09-022025-11-13
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-09-30
Input modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Output modalitiesUnknownUnknown
Context window1,048,576400,000
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, code_execution, computer_use, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

12 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met

Gemini 3.8 Flash Capabilities

chatcode executioncomputer usegenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.75
Output price$3.75
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.8-flash

GPT-5.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$1.25
Output price$10.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.1 FAQs

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash is $0.75 and GPT-5.1 is $1.25 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.8 Flash is $3.75 and GPT-5.1 is $10.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1,048,576 and GPT-5.1 supports 400,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.8 Flash is not marked open weight; GPT-5.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.1 understand images?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash is not documented with image input; GPT-5.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1?+

GPT-5.1 has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 65,536 and GPT-5.1 supports 128,000 output tokens.

Do Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash: reasoning and tool calling. GPT-5.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1?+

Gemini 3.8 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.1 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-5.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback