Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind |  Qwen3.8 FlashQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #15 of 5767.5 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2, LMArena Text · full-core range 22.5–89.2 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #5 of 27$0.021 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9 | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #3 of 2764.2 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2, LMArena Text · full-core range 41.7–75.0 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.75Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.113Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.75Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.382Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Qwen3.8-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader | 78.0599% of row best · percent · gemini-3.6-flash-high · 14,746 output tokens / case | 79.12100% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-flash-next · 54,438 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified | 69.1692% of row best · points · Gemini 3.6 Flash (high thinking) · 13,346 output tokens / case | 75.30100% of row best · points · Qwen3.8 Flash (thinking on) · 31,590 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Qwen3.8-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Qwen |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Qwen3 8 Flash |
| Model | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Version | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Qwen3.8-Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Gemini 3.6 Flash Capabilities
Qwen3.8 Flash Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini Deep Research MaxGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-5.1OpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.2 ProOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash FAQs
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?+
Gemini 3.6 Flash is $0.75 and Qwen3.8 Flash is $0.113 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.6 Flash is $3.75 and Qwen3.8 Flash is $0.382 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?+
Gemini 3.6 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.6 Flash is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Flash is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash understand images?+
Gemini 3.6 Flash is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?+
Qwen3.8 Flash has the larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 65,536 tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 131,072 tokens.
Do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.6 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?+
Gemini 3.6 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Flash has 4, so Qwen3.8 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.