Command A Translate vs Granite 4.2 30B

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Cohere · activeCommand A TranslateVerified Sep 3, 2026
IBM · activeGranite 4.2 30BVerified Sep 2, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldCommand A TranslateGranite 4.2 30B
DeveloperCohereIBM
FamilyCommand AGranite 4 2
ModelCommand A TranslateGranite 4.2 30B
VersionCommand A TranslateGranite 4.2 30B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-08-282026-08-25
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-01Unknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window8K131K
Total parameters111B29.3B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessCohere (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, structured_outputs, translationchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

15 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Command A Translate Capabilities

chatgenerationstructured outputstranslation
Input price
Output price
Serving providers1
Canonical IDcoherelabs/command-a-translate-08-2025

Granite 4.2 30B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.16
Output price$0.65
Serving providers1
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Command A Translate vs Granite 4.2 30B FAQs

Is Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Command A Translate and Granite 4.2 30B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.16 per million tokens. Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced output price: $0.65 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Granite 4.2 30B has the larger sourced context window. Command A Translate supports 8K and Granite 4.2 30B supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B be self-hosted?+

Granite 4.2 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Command A Translate is not marked open weight; Granite 4.2 30B is open weight.

Can Command A Translate and Granite 4.2 30B understand images?+

Command A Translate is not documented with image input; Granite 4.2 30B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Command A Translate is 8K and Granite 4.2 30B is —.

Do Command A Translate and Granite 4.2 30B support reasoning and tool use?+

Command A Translate: none of these features are definitively sourced. Granite 4.2 30B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B?+

Command A Translate has 1 sourced provider route; Granite 4.2 30B has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Command A Translate or Granite 4.2 30B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback