Bolmo 7B vs Llama 3.1 8B
At a Glance
| Compare |  Bolmo 7BAi2 |  Llama 3.1 8BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Bolmo 7B | Llama-3.1-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Ai2 | Meta |
| Family | Bolmo | Llama 3 1 8b |
| Model | Bolmo 7B | Llama-3.1-8B |
| Version | Bolmo 7B | Llama-3.1-8B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-13 | 2024-07-23 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-12-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 7.6B | 8B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | llama3.1 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Hugging Face (Standard) |
| Capabilities | generation | generation |
Bolmo 7B Capabilities
Llama 3.1 8B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs |  Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs | developer peerstext | |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs | Phi-4-mini-instructMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs |  Codestral-22B-v0.1Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs | Devstral-2-123B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs | Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Bolmo 7BAi2 | cross-developer peerstext |
Bolmo 7BAi2 | vs |  PII-TracerPerplexity | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Bolmo 7B vs Llama 3.1 8B FAQs
Is Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Bolmo 7B and Llama 3.1 8B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
Llama 3.1 8B has the larger sourced context window. Bolmo 7B supports 65,536 tokens and Llama 3.1 8B supports 131,072 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Bolmo 7B is open weight; Llama 3.1 8B is open weight.
Can Bolmo 7B and Llama 3.1 8B understand images?+
Bolmo 7B is not documented with image input; Llama 3.1 8B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Bolmo 7B and Llama 3.1 8B support reasoning and tool use?+
Bolmo 7B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Llama 3.1 8B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
Bolmo 7B has 0 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.1 8B has 1, so Llama 3.1 8B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Bolmo 7B or Llama 3.1 8B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.