App Comparison · category peers

Windsurf vs Kiro

Systematic comparison of Windsurf and Kiro across deployment, access, interfaces, automation, and sourced product capabilities. Green highlights mark stronger normalized product-surface values; qualitative tradeoffs remain neutral.

FieldAt a Glance
Windsurf · ProprietaryWindsurfCoding agent · verified Aug 29, 2026
Amazon Web Services · MixedKiroCoding agent · verified Aug 29, 2026

Product Surface

Side-by-Side App Facts

Indexable
FieldWindsurfKiro
DeveloperWindsurfAmazon Web Services
CategoryCoding agentCoding agent
LifecycleActiveActive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
AccessProprietaryMixed
LicenseUnknownComponent-specific
Self-hostableNoYes
Local executionYesYes
Cloud executionYesYes
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, LinuxmacOS, Windows, Linux, Web
InterfacesIDE, CLIIDE, CLI, Web
Model accessWindsurf-managed and supported frontier modelsKiro-managed and supported models
AutomationCascade workflows, rules, memories, and tool callsSpecs, steering, hooks, autonomous agents, and CLI workflows
Multi-agentUnknownYes
Persistent memoryYesYes
MCP supportYesYes
PricingFree and paid individual and team plansFree and paid plans; component terms vary

14 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Editorially curated pair with developer-owned primary sources

Shared Surface

Overlapping Documented Capabilities

MCPautomationcodebase-editingcodingmemoryterminal

Developer Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Windsurf vs Kiro FAQs

Is Windsurf or Kiro better for coding?+

Model Markets does not currently publish a normalized coding-quality benchmark for apps. Windsurf documents 6 capabilities and Kiro documents 8; compare their shared capabilities, interfaces, execution modes, and model access rather than treating feature count as coding quality.

Can Windsurf or Kiro run locally?+

Both document support.

Does Windsurf or Kiro support MCP?+

Both document support.

Which supports multi-agent workflows and persistent memory?+

Multi-agent: Kiro is the only one currently documented with support. Persistent memory: Both document support.

Is Windsurf or Kiro open source?+

Windsurf uses a proprietary access model; Kiro uses a mixed access model under Component-specific.

Which platforms support Windsurf and Kiro?+

Windsurf: macOS, Windows, and Linux. Kiro: macOS, Windows, Linux, and Web.

Can Windsurf and Kiro run in the cloud?+

Both document cloud execution.

How can I interact with Windsurf and Kiro?+

Windsurf documents IDE and CLI; Kiro documents IDE, CLI, and Web.

Which has more integrations, Windsurf or Kiro?+

Windsurf has 3 documented integrations; Kiro has 3. Integration count measures sourced breadth, not depth or reliability.

How does pricing differ between Windsurf and Kiro?+

Windsurf: Free and paid individual and team plans. Kiro: Free and paid plans; component terms vary. These qualitative plan descriptions are not ranked as if they were equivalent prices.

Send Feedback