App comparison · category peers
Windsurf vs Continue
Systematic comparison of Windsurf and Continue across deployment, access, interfaces, automation, and sourced product capabilities. Green highlights mark stronger normalized product-surface values; qualitative tradeoffs remain neutral.
Product surface
Side-by-side app facts
| Field | Windsurf | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Windsurf | Continue |
| Category | Coding agent | Coding agent |
| Lifecycle | Active | Active |
| Access | Proprietary | Open source |
| License | Unknown | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Local execution | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud execution | Yes | No |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Interfaces | IDE, CLI | IDE extension, CLI |
| Model access | Windsurf-managed and supported frontier models | Multiple hosted and local model providers |
| Automation | Cascade workflows, rules, memories, and tool calls | Agent mode, rules, tools, and headless workflows |
| Multi-agent | Unknown | Unknown |
| Persistent memory | Yes | Unknown |
| MCP support | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free and paid individual and team plans | Free core software with optional managed services |
13 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Editorially curated pair with developer-owned primary sources
Shared surface
Overlapping documented capabilities
Developer evidence