App Comparison · category peers
Cursor vs Roo Code
Systematic comparison of Cursor and Roo Code across deployment, access, interfaces, automation, and sourced product capabilities. Green highlights mark stronger normalized product-surface values; qualitative tradeoffs remain neutral.
Product Surface
Side-by-Side App Facts
| Field | Cursor | Roo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anysphere | Roo Code |
| Category | Coding agent | Coding agent |
| Lifecycle | Active | Active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Access | Proprietary | Open source |
| License | Unknown | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Local execution | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud execution | Yes | No |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, Android | macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Interfaces | IDE, CLI, Web, Mobile | IDE extension |
| Model access | Cursor-managed and supported frontier models | Multiple hosted and local model providers |
| Automation | Background agents, parallel agents, and command-line runs | Custom modes, tools, checkpoints, and MCP workflows |
| Multi-agent | Yes | Yes |
| Persistent memory | Yes | Unknown |
| MCP support | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free and paid individual and business plans | Free software; model usage is separate |
14 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Editorially curated pair with developer-owned primary sources
Shared Surface
Overlapping Documented Capabilities
Developer Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Cursor vs Roo Code FAQs
Is Cursor or Roo Code better for coding?+
Model Markets does not currently publish a normalized coding-quality benchmark for apps. Cursor documents 7 capabilities and Roo Code documents 6; compare their shared capabilities, interfaces, execution modes, and model access rather than treating feature count as coding quality.
Can Cursor or Roo Code run locally?+
Both document support.
Does Cursor or Roo Code support MCP?+
Both document support.
Which supports multi-agent workflows and persistent memory?+
Multi-agent: Both document support. Persistent memory: Cursor is the only one currently documented with support.
Is Cursor or Roo Code open source?+
Cursor uses a proprietary access model; Roo Code uses a open source access model under Apache-2.0.
Which platforms support Cursor and Roo Code?+
Cursor: macOS, Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, and Android. Roo Code: macOS, Windows, and Linux.
Can Cursor and Roo Code run in the cloud?+
Cursor is the only one currently documented with cloud execution.
How can I interact with Cursor and Roo Code?+
Cursor documents IDE, CLI, Web, and Mobile; Roo Code documents IDE extension.
Which has more integrations, Cursor or Roo Code?+
Cursor has 3 documented integrations; Roo Code has 4. Integration count measures sourced breadth, not depth or reliability.
How does pricing differ between Cursor and Roo Code?+
Cursor: Free and paid individual and business plans. Roo Code: Free software; model usage is separate. These qualitative plan descriptions are not ranked as if they were equivalent prices.