App comparison · category peers

Cursor vs Devin

Systematic comparison of Cursor and Devin across deployment, access, interfaces, automation, and sourced product capabilities. Green highlights mark stronger normalized product-surface values; qualitative tradeoffs remain neutral.

FieldAt a glance
Anysphere · ProprietaryCursorCoding agent · verified Aug 28, 2026
Cognition · ProprietaryDevinCoding agent · verified Aug 28, 2026

Product surface

Side-by-side app facts

Indexable
FieldCursorDevin
DeveloperAnysphereCognition
CategoryCoding agentCoding agent
LifecycleActiveActive
AccessProprietaryProprietary
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Self-hostableNoNo
Local executionYesNo
Cloud executionYesYes
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, Linux, Web, iOS, AndroidWeb
InterfacesIDE, CLI, Web, MobileWeb, API
Model accessCursor-managed and supported frontier modelsCognition-managed models
AutomationBackground agents, parallel agents, and command-line runsAutonomous sessions, scheduled work, and API workflows
Multi-agentYesYes
Persistent memoryYesYes
MCP supportYesUnknown
PricingFree and paid individual and business plansPaid individual and enterprise plans

14 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Editorially curated pair with developer-owned primary sources

Shared surface

Overlapping documented capabilities

automationcodebase-editingcodingmemorymulti-agentterminal

Developer evidence

Sources and freshness

Send feedback

Cursor vs Devin · Model Markets